17.8.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 222/1

(1)

Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 health claims made on foods are prohibited unless they are authorised by the Commission in accordance with that Regulation and included in a list of permitted claims.

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 also provides that applications for authorisations of health claims may be submitted by food business operators to the national competent authority of a Member State. The national competent authority is to forward valid applications to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), hereinafter referred to as ‘the Authority’, for a scientific assessment, as well as to the Commission and the Member States for information.

(3)

The Authority is to deliver an opinion on the health claim concerned.

(4)

The Commission is to decide on the authorisation of health claims taking into account the opinion delivered by the Authority.

(5)

Following an application from E-piim production Ltd, submitted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the Authority was required to deliver an opinion on a health claim related to Lactobacillus plantarum TENSIA® in the semi-hard Edam-type ‘heart cheese’ of Harmony™ and maintenance of normal blood pressure (BP) (Question No EFSA-Q-2014-00097 (2)). The claim proposed by the applicant was worded as follows: ‘Regular, at least for eight week consumption of 50 g/day Lactobacillus plantarum TENSIA® comprising Südamejuust (English translation: Heart cheese) of the Harmony™ brand helps to maintain the cardio-vascular system/heart health through reduction of blood pressure/Symbol of heart’.

(6)

On 1 October 2014, the Commission and the Member States received the scientific opinion from the Authority, which concluded that on the basis of the data presented a cause and effect relationship had not been established between the consumption of Lactobacillus plantarum TENSIA® in the semi-hard Edam-type ‘heart cheese’ of Harmony™ and maintenance of normal blood pressure. Accordingly, as the claim does not comply with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, it should not be authorised.

(7)

Following an application from British Specialist Nutrition Association Ltd, submitted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the Authority was required to deliver an opinion on a health claim related to carbohydrate solutions and maintenance of physical performance during endurance exercise (Question No EFSA-Q-2014-00058 (3)). The claim proposed by the applicant was worded as follows: ‘carbohydrate solutions contribute to the maintenance of endurance performance during prolonged endurance exercise’. Upon request of the Authority, the applicant specified that the food that is the subject of this claim relates to carbohydrate solutions that do not include electrolytes and that, as regards the claimed effect, carbohydrate solutions should be compared to water or water-electrolyte solutions.

(8)

On 1 October 2014, the Commission and the Member States received the scientific opinion from the Authority, which concluded that on the basis of the data presented a cause and effect relationship had not been established between the consumption of carbohydrate solutions and maintenance of physical performance during endurance exercise as compared to water or water-electrolyte solutions. Accordingly, as the claim does not comply with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, it should not be authorised.

(9)

The comments from the applicants received by the Commission pursuant to Article 16(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 have been considered when setting the measures provided for in this Regulation.

(10)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,